Laptop Upgrades and Exploring OS's on Removable Media Part 1 (Acer Upgrades And Linux on a Thumb Drive)

 

Laptop Upgrades And Time For Windows 7 To Bite The Dust

So I have a Acer Aspire 5733 laptop that I've been making upgrades to. The laptop came with a Intel Pentium P6200 dual-core processor running at 2.1GHz, a 500GB, 5400 RPM drive with 4GB's of RAM, and a battery that's been abused to the point of lasting only 10 minutes on its own juices. For that intended upgrade to Windows 10 that has yet to happened, I decided that this machine would need a massive upgrade to accommodate the latest of Redmond's offerings. As such, parts were ordered off of NewEgg. A new battery to replace the 10 year old workhorse  arrived and now I can get 2-1/2 to 3 hours off of a single charge. The RAM was upgraded to 8GB's. The memory upgrade only cost around $40 while the battery cost $15.

The Hard Drive
The laptop is used primarily for Facebook, YouTube, and Blogging. During my seasonal office job, it's also used as a office machine outputting various PDF, Word, and Excel documents along with the online applications. As such, the task that performed on the Acer doesn't require massive amounts of disk space. I don't use this laptop for games. Of the 500GB volume, I typically hover around 300-350GB GB free, and that's after 10 years of use.  I never worried about running out of disk space on my current setup.

As such, when I decided that the laptop HD was going to be upgrade, I decided to go with a SSD (Solid-State Drive). For those who are less tech inclined, SSD drives is essentially a flash drive in a hard-drive form factor. It's a storage device that uses integrated circuits and their are no moving mechanical parts, like a flash drive.

This is in sharp contrast to a hard disk  drive where their are moving parts and the drive contains thin, round platters that contain the data. Their is a mechanical drive-head that scans the platters reading the data on them. Since solid state drives don't have mechanical parts and are based on computer chips for storage (with much faster seek/read times), they perform much faster than a standard hard-drive. The drive-head of a mechanical drive has to constantly scan the platters reading data, which results in degraded performance and constant wear that will cause drive failure down the road. Because SSD drives don't have moving parts, they have a significantly longer life expectancy than a hard disk drive.

Despite the huge pluses that SSD's bring to the table, their is one major disadvantage (that's rapidly being overcome) though: price. At a similar price-point, SSD's offer a lot less storage than their mechanical counterparts. Thus, these drives are significant more expensive unless one buys a smaller capacity drive. Recreating my 3 terabyte desktop setup as a SSD configuration would cost around $250. Recreating a similar 3 TB setup using two (1TB and 2TB) brand-new 7200 RPM drives would cost around $90 (Seagate BarraCude ST1000DM010 andST2000DM008respectively on NewEgg) at the time of this article.

A purchaser can have both price and performance up to a certain point. At that point though, the user must determine what's a higher priority; capacity or performance. On my desktop machine, I host several virtual machines, videos, music, and games. As such, the priority for that machine is going to be capacity. On my laptop, which again, is used for mostly office work and the Internet (which doesn't consume mountain-loads of disk space), I can make performance the main priority.

When it comes to making performance the priority, SSD's have become very economically viable and offer enough storage without feeling the squeeze. Originally, I decided to order the drive in October. However, with the unexpected early demands, I decided to hold off on purchasing the drive until early January. The busy Winter Season is the absolutely the worst time to perform a hard-drive upgrade. Seriously, what in the Hell possesses people to perform upgrades at the busiest time of year. Do computer upgrades either before or after the Holiday Season not during!

Getting past that small rant, I waited til things calm down before ordering the new drive upgrade. When I did order my new SSD, I went with a Silicon Power Ace A55 SSD with a 512GB storage, matching the capacity of my current laptop drive. I paid $53 for it (not bad at all for the capacity). When that drive came in, I wondered if their was anything in the box because it felt empty. Sure enough, their was a drive in their. the drive case is made out of plastic, while the components weighed next to nothing. 

In the meantime....
I wanted something to try until I ordered by SSD. Their were brief glimpses of free time to carry out such experiments. With the cyber Monday sells, I've purchased a few USB thumb drives for my Linux experiment. I spent $4 each for two 32GB drives and $8 each for two 64GB thumb drives. These  thumb drives are USB 3 Compatible. However, this isn't a selling point for me as the USB ports on the laptop, being 10 years old like the rest of the machine, still conformed to the USB 2 standard. One can't upgrade the USB ports in a laptop.

I didn't want to accidentally install Linux on my Windows drive instead of the USB stick. As such, I took it to my desktop machine and created a VMware Player Linux configuration, and capturing the thumb drive within the VM. For the experiment, I chose SparkyLinux as it's more lightweight compared to the full-fledged Linux distro's like Ubuntu or Redhat Fedora. Being more lightweight also means I have a lot more control over which software packages are installed on my setup.

The selling point of SparkyLinux is it's advertised ability to support many more window managers than most other distros. Within the Linux/Unix world, a desktop manager provides the general look and feel of for the environment in use. While one can install different desktop managers on Ubuntu, I wanted to use a distro that only came with the very basic and them upgrade to something more functional when need be, and not start off with the kitchen sink already included, so to say.

Using my VMware Player VM, I've installed SparkyLinux on my USB thumb drive. I don't actually remember how long the installation took because 20 minutes into the setup, I went to eat supper. When I came back an hour later, the install was almost complete. It finished about 15 minutes later. The thumb drive was removed from my desktop, plugged into the Acer laptop, powered on  with me hitting the "F12" key on the BIOS screen to bring up the boot menu. The USB thumb drive was detected and the boot process started after hitting "Enter".

From their, I waited, and then waited some more, and then their was more waiting after that. It took Linux about 2 minutes to boot into the login screen. It then took another minute for LXDE to load. LXDE is a very lightweight desktop manager used in many Linux distros. I was surprised. For a solid-state device, this is very slow. The performance was much slower than what I expected. I thought that it would have been much faster given that USB thumb drives are solid-state devices.

It took longer for Linux to load from that USB thumb stick then it took Windows 7 to boot and load from that 5400 RPM drive. Going online, I've discovered that USB drives were very slow due to a whole variety of reasons. The page "Why are USB flash drivers much slower than SSDs?" is linked below and provides a very in-depth examination of the topic. One thing that has to be mentioned is that while the speed of the USB port is a contributing factor, it's actually not the deciding one, though, as their are many other factors at play.

I was always under the impression that USB thumb drives, while not being as fast as SSD's, should be faster than a 5400 RPM hard-drive. Linux on a flash drive wasn't going to be a thing.

Now, I could have loaded a ISO images on flash drives using the Rufus utility in Windows and that image would have booted from the USB port in a acceptable amount of time. The main issue though with this approach is the ISO image is read-only, and any changes made under that Linux session would be lost after a shut-down. While good for a data-recovery system in conjuration with other backup drives , this isn't ideal solution for a temporary work environment.

However, their was a experiment that I wanted to try. An worthwhile experiment which would reap immediate benefits and bare fruit and make these solutions worth exploring. In the next article, I'm exploring OS's that were installed on SD Cards via USB adapter. 

Articles of Interest

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WeatherStar 4000 Simulator For Windows (Part 1)

Image
  It's time to get the weather forecast, 90's style. A couple of months ago, I reviewed the WeatherStar 4000+ simulator for web-browsers. This simulator, created by Mike Battaglia, is a open-source, on-line simulator of the WeatherStar 4000 hardware used by The Weather Channel during the 1990's. This simulator ran without issue on both Firefox and Chrome on Windows 7 (Home PC) and Firefox on Windows 10 (Dell Optiplex).  It also runs great under Chrome on my Android devices as well. I use the online simulator when I'm on the road.  Now, I'm going to look into the WeatherStar 4000 simulator for Windows offered by Taiganet. This simulator offers a lot of features and can be customized in various ways. When I'm home, I use this program most of the time. Now, there is one notable hardware requirement. First, to run the Windows (and Mac OSX/Linux ports as well) simulator, you will need a computer that supports OpenGL 3.3. My home computer ha...
Read more

Classic Systems Emulated: Windows 95 (Part 1)

Image
  Start Me Up! Windows 95 (Chicago Beta Build 189 released September 1994) running under PCEM What would eventually become Windows 95 was affected by several turn of events that occurred during its development. Windows 95, code-named Chicago, had been several years in the making. Microsoft had already been planning the next version of Windows right after they got 3.1 out the door on March 1992. What would determine the course of the new OS? DOS Compatibility for one as it was still deemed essential at that point. One has to remember that even though Windows 3.0 had been the most successful version of Windows to date, the GUI in general was still a novelty at that point. Most used Windows 3.0 for simple task like typing list, letters, or playing solitaire. Most PC users who needed to work on major projects were still running DOS applications like WordPerfect or Lotus 123. However, the transition to GUI's would begin in earnest.  The 486 processor ...
Read more

Classic Systems Emulated: Windows 3.1 OEMS

Image
  The OEM's Want In On The Action The PC Market of the early 90's was a very competitive one. As such, having a easy-to-use environment was a must for these companies pushing there hardware. Hardware has caught up to software, and as such, it was now time to push the command prompt out of the way for the GUI. Several of these companies spotted opportunities to make  deals with Microsoft to pre-install Windows on there computers. This phenomenon didn't start with 3.1 though. Even in the late 80's, both Compaq and IBM often preinstalled Windows 386 for corporate customers that brought there 386 systems. Windows 3.0 was bundled with a lot of systems too. It was preinstalled on the IBM PS/1 budget PC's and various Tandy models. It came with the Amstrad MegaPC and various other PC's offered by ZDS (Zenith Data Systems) as well.  The number of OEM partners grew with the Windows 3.1 release. Some of them were familiar faces, like Compa...
Read more

Old Hardware Emulated :Psion Model 3a Emulated On DOSBox Windows

Image
  Psion 3a and 3c Psion Series 3c Handheld Computer (Wikipedia) Psion 3a As mentioned in the previous articles, the emulators for the Psion 3 exist only on DOSBox. I decided to take the challenge of setting up a emulated configuration. What must one do. There is already a very good guide on the internet titled "PocketBook II emulation..." which is linked below in the article. Highly recommended. Setting up a emulated Psion 3 takes a little bit of effort, but it's possible and is a good exploration of setting up a DOSBox configuration. I'm making the safe assumption that the fast majority of those reading this are using Windows systems, but DOSBox has been ported to Mac OS X and Linux as well, so this guide might work on those systems.  The first thing I did was created a folder called dosbox_psion3 (Folder naming is based on personal preference). Make the following new folders within dosbox_psion3; psion3, a, b, and m. With the f...
Read more

Classic Systems Emulated: OS/2 Version 2.0 On PCEM

Image
  The Arrival Of 32-Bit Power For The Masses The past couple of these PC articles have been very Windows-centric. This isn't a surprise as Windows 3.0 was a major release that made a very massive impact on the marketplace. Windows 3.1 sold 3 million copies in 6 weeks. 1992 was a very different time. Back then, it was possible to request a PC without an operating system. If one did want an OS, they could choose between OS/2, DOS, or the DOS+Windows combination. I've had not forgotten OS/2 in these articles. The 286 versions of OS/2 had already been covered in my articles about the IBM PS/2 family of computers. The messy IBM-Microsoft "divorce" had been covered in detail as well. To quickly recap: Microsoft didn't like the direction that IBM wanted to take OS/2. Microsoft envisioned OS/2 as being the "next-generation" OS, while IBM simply saw the OS as a tool to sell more hardware. OS/2 did terrible in the marketplace. The ...
Read more

Old Hardware Emulated - Windows Mobile 5.0

Image
Working title for this post was "But Mama, That's Where The Fun Is!". Appropriate as by the middle 2000's, Windows Mobile was where all the action was at. The sky was only getting brighter for Microsoft as Palm was slowly imploding on itself. With Microsoft's mobile offerings becoming more widespread by the day, the Redmond Giant followed up with the newest version of WM, version 5.0, on May 2005. On the surface, it appears that little changed. However, the biggest change were "under the hood" with the incorporation of the .NET Compact Framework, which is basically the mobile version of .NET. Also, WM 5.0 introduced newer power-saving capabilities which often improved the battery life of devices by as much as 50%. WM backed up everything to flash memory. WinMobile would use a combination of RAM and flash memory to preserve battery life. This wasn't noticeable by the user.  As such, their is no data loss if power is lost.  Windows Media Player was upd...
Read more

Old Hardware Emulated : Pocket PC 2000/2002

Image
  Windows CE On The PDA Pocket PC 2002 starting up. For the remainder of the 90's, Microsoft had a tough time gaining a foothold in the handheld market. Windows CE 2.0 was well received on the palmtop PC's. However, that market-share was small compared to there PDA counterpart that were rocking to the tune of PalmOS. The first incarnation of WinCE on the PDA seemed sparse compared to Palm. At this point, the PDA port of Windows CE was re-branded as Windows Mobile. Around this point, Microsoft's fortunes began to change. For the first time, the Palm platform had that "Oh Crap!" moment when Compaq released the iPAQ in April 2000. The PDA came with the new Windows Pocket PC 2000 operating system. This version of Windows CE was specifically geared towards PDA's in particular. The iPAQ line of PDA's became must own devices for those that wanted the latest and greatest. As how Compaq made IBM look silly in the 80's and 90's...
Read more

Old Hardware Emulated :Einstein emulating the Apple Newton (Part 3)

Image
  NewtonOS Android in Action! Einstein emulating the Newton Messagepad on a Amazon Fire HD7 tablet. Einstein Seriously, did you not expect me to run a OS designed for a classic handheld device on a modern tablet!? It's interesting running Einstein on a PC, but I want to try this platform out on a handheld that was similar in form-factor to the original device. Einstein had been ported to Android as well. It's not as recent as the current builds available for iOS, MacOS, and Ubuntu Linux, but it works well enough. Running the emulator means doing a few things before hand, like loading the Android package, ROM, and other needed files. The apk file that I downloaded was "einstein.05.01.2013.apk", which can be found at a archived version of the code.Google.com page (link posted below). You will also need a ROM file named "717006" that needs to be placed in the "/sdcard/Downloads/Einstein/" directory of your Androi...
Read more

Classic Games Emulated: Revisiting NFS High Stakes Modding

Image
  Modding On The Mind! As anyone who's read my NFS:HS article or watching my uploads on YouTube, one can tell that they're two things that I'm a fan of: NFS:HS and Virtualization. I like contained environments that allow me to run beloved games from the past on far more powerful configurations. It only seemed natural for me to embark on the journey of getting NFS:HS running under VMware Player. I had a original copy of the game on CD-ROM which was installed on my guest setup. The guest configuration had two cores allocated to it, 2GB's of RAM, and 3D acceleration via my Nvidia GTX 950. The guest OS running was Windows 7 32-bit. After installing HS, I copied the patch, and started to burn rubber. After that, I duplicated the game folder so I could have two installations: one stock and another one for mod. Within the NFS:HS folder, their are various directories. The "DATA/CARS" folder has both the racing and traffic cars. The first t...
Read more

OS/2 Warp 4

Image
(Any blogpost where I don't have to cover politics is a win in my books!) OS/2 Warp 4 was a very noble endeavor. It was IBM's statement to the world to demonstrate there commitment to the OS/2 operating system. However, when it arrived in 1996, OS/2 Warp 4 was dead on arrival. A lot had happened between the launch of Warp 3 and Warp 4, with the biggest of them being the arrival of Windows 95. Microsoft, making the most of their OEM connections, started to lock OS/2 out of the OEM markets prior to the launch of Windows 95. With threats of either not receiving the latest Windows or paying much higher license fees, many OEM's relented to Microsoft's pressure. Warp 3 struggled against Windows 3.1 along with the soon-to-be-tidal wave that would be Windows 95. Not only that, Microsoft had a vendetta against Big Blue for previous acts.  Lotus 123 For OS/2 Warp 4 Faced with accusations that Microsoft incorporated OS/2 source code into Windows 3.x which would have violated the j...
Read more